dissents by Souter and Ginsburg, JJ.; decided January 24, 2005. On certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois. DDS No. 00-0-0000. After an Illinois state trooper stopped respondent for speeding ...

But in early 2005, in Illinois v. Caballes, the court reaffirmed Place, backing off the standard it had seemed to articulate in Kyllo. "Critical to that [Kyllo] decision," Justice John Paul ...

It took less than five full pages to decide the case of Illinois v. Caballes on January 24. But that 6-2 ruling raised deeper questions under the Fourth Amendment about using a drug-sniffing canine ...

Two weeks ago the Supreme Court handed down its 6-2 opinion in Illinois v. Caballes. It deserved more attention than we of the press accorded it. The case turned on evidence supplied by a drug ...

In the 2005 case Illinois v. Caballes, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that "the use of a well-trained narcotics-detection dog…during a lawful traffic stop generally does not implicate ...

The argument inspired many canine jokes. Caballes' lawyer at one point asked if he was an underdog in the case. The case is Illinois v. Caballes, 03-923.

Rehnquist did not appear yesterday, but Justice John Paul Stevens announced that Rehnquist will vote on the case. The case is Illinois v. Caballes, No. 03-923. A decision is expected by July.

The argument inspired many canine jokes. Caballes' lawyer at one point asked if he was an underdog in the case. The case is Illinois v. Caballes, 03-923.

<TAB>The Supreme Court agreed yesterday to decide whether police can use drug-sniffing dogs to check out motorists pulled over for speeding or other reasons, but who have given police no ...

ACLU of Illinois Disappointed with High Court Ruling on Drug Dog Searches, Calls for State Law to Prevent Searches Without Suspicion ACLU of Illinois Disappointed with High Court Ruling on Drug Dog ...