Was the Navy’s F-111 Really That Bad? Pentagon leaders insisted that an Air Force fighter-bomber would make a great Navy interceptor. They should have asked the Navy.

Military Aviation History. HARS: F-111, Mirage, Orion, Neptune. Posted: April 14, 2025 | Last updated: April 14, 2025. Come on a day tour of the HARS museum at Shellharbour where we are give a ...

Delivery of the F-111 to the Royal Australian Air Force was held up until General Dynamics could iron out a fatal flaw in the wing pivot design.

As a military-hardware order that had been proclaimed the richest in U.S. history, the F-111 fighter-bomber project seemed likely to set more records for hot controversy than cold cash. Air Force ...

The F-111 Aardvark entered the U.S. Air Force inventory in 1967, embodying a radical approach to design and functionality. Conceived in 1960, ... It was powered by two Pratt & Whitney TF30-P-111 ...

The F-111 crew escape module blasts away from the aircraft if there is a need to eject. Credit: Wolter Peeters. It gets more complicated. What he is working on didn’t all come from one aircraft.

In real life, the General Dynamics F-111 was a plane that even the U.S. Air Force seemed to forget it operated at times. Heck, even its "Aardvark" nickname was only christened right as the plane ...

F-111 Aardvark, also known as the "Pig," was one of the most effective military jets ever created, so why was this elite fighter jet retired?

A combined 50,200 lbs of thrust at full afterburner propelled an 82,800 lb ... the F-111 was one of only a handful of jets to ever be test fitted with the AGM-69 SRAM thermonuclear missile.

The F-111 went through four inlet configurations before the problems in a not very maneuverable aircraft were resolved. The later F-14 -always- had inlet problems with the TF30.