The Stanford Review
November 1, 2024. Stanford's Handshake Admins Reject Defense Tech Startup Aurelius Systems. Garret Molloy. October 31, 2024. A Convicted Sex Offender's Return to Stanford? Stanford Review. October 25, 2024. Stanford Needs to …
Young Men in Crisis
Sep 30, 2024 · At Stanford, women now outnumber men by 7% among undergraduates. This seemingly small difference belies a significant shift in campus demographics and academic achievement from 50 years ago, when the ratio of students (as well as applicants) was 67% men to 33% women. While the gender parity achieved in recent decades was a positive trend, we've now swung well past equilibrium.
How Did Everything Get So Liberal? - The Stanford Review
May 17, 2021 · Through analyzing political donations, Hanania concludes that everything feels liberal in a closely divided country because politics is a participation sport. Liberals care more about politics, and eagerly push their values in the institutions they participate in. If conservatives want to ‘win the culture,’ they should care more, too.
Affirmative Action: What Should We Do Instead? - The Stanford …
Apr 8, 2019 · While a decade and a half have passed since the decision was made, her words remain more relevant than ever in light of an ongoing lawsuit alleging Harvard’s admissions discriminates against Asian-Americans: “affirmative action should be a temporary bandage rather than a permanent cure.”. In the majority opinion for the case, O’Connor ...
The Morality of Affirmative Action is Complicated; Its Legality, Less …
Mar 7, 2023 · Last October, the Supreme Court began hearing arguments on what promises to be a seminal pair of cases challenging affirmative action policies used by Harvard and the University of North Carolina. The question at hand is whether admissions policies that weigh the race of applicants are congruent with the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Data not Guesswork: How to Handle Bias in AI - The Stanford Review
Jan 10, 2022 · As artificial intelligence becomes commonplace in industries ranging from finance to medicine to defense, a revolution is underway. Research labs in both industry and academia have devoted immense resources to combating bias — observed favoritism for or against a certain group — in AI. This year, for example, Google doubled [https://www.
Arguing For and Against Genetic Engineering - The Stanford …
Jun 7, 2007 · The logic behind this argument is that human genetic enhancement perpetuates discrimination against the disabled and the “genetically unfit,” and that this sort of discrimination is similar to the sort that inspired the eugenics of the Third Reich. A third argument is that genetic engineering will lead to vast social inequalities.
About Us - The Stanford Review
Our Staff. Julia Steinberg, Editor-in-Chief. Julia is a senior from Los Angeles, CA studying comparative literature and history. Outside of the Review, Julia enjoys Russian literature, hiking, Coupa, and live music (preferably rock). Contact Julia at [email protected]. Abhi Desai, Executive Editor.
Why Stanford: To the Contrarians of 2024 - The Stanford Review
Apr 22, 2020 · Why Stanford: To the Contrarians of 2024. “A contrarian isn’t one who always objects — that’s a conformist of a different sort. A contrarian reasons independently, from the ground up, and resists pressure to conform.”. - Naval Ravikant, entrepreneur and investor. We were all ProFros once: excited and more than a little anxious about ...
To SLE or not to SLE? - The Stanford Review
Jun 2, 2020 · SLE (Structured Liberal Education) is one of Stanford’s signature humanities programs, but is also one of the most divisive: students either swear by it or despise it. As three students who have had widely varying experiences with (or without) SLE, we’ve attempted to put together a truly fair assessment of the merits and downfalls of the ...